Skip to main content

About your Search

20120925
20121003
SHOW
STATION
LANGUAGE
Search Results 0 to 7 of about 8 (some duplicates have been removed)
FOX News
Sep 25, 2012 2:00pm PDT
and said that the defensive free people reflects universal value. then he says true democracy demands citizens cannot be thrown in jail for what they believe. but we arrested the guy who made the video. then he said we're committed to helping you in the fight for democracy. if you don't secure american, which you shouldn't rely on them to do, we'll leave. >> bob: what is cognitive dissonance? >> andrea: competing theories through your brain. >> dana: we went ten days to call it different things. they blame it on the video and friday the spokesperson said it's self-evident it's terrorism. today, president obama didn't call it terrorism. why is that? >> bob: i think charles krauthammer is wrong here. they want the focus on the mideast and europe. a lot of other things around the world. keep it off of the u.s. u.s. economy. why does he call it terrorism is the million dollar question. the saudis or egyptians got to him. they decide they don't want to use that word. >> dana: comforting. >> because we talk about it and we'll blame him. he said terrorism september 19 and backed off of it. t
FOX News
Sep 27, 2012 11:00pm PDT
the investigation. that's what the defense attorneys do. you have a bunch representing the jihadnist the department of law and they think it -- >> bob: you're suggesting -- [ overtalk ] >> bob: you are suggesting a complete and total amount of evidence available in-1/2 hours that confirmed, officially confirmed this was a terrorist attack? >> eric: they labeled it. fox news conditional label it. fox news is saying that the white house -- >> kimberly: the administration. >> eric: -- they told fox news -- >> bob: sources? >> eric: u.s. officials told fox news. they labeled it. >> bob: if you went to any intelligence group of people, everybody would have reached the same conclusion we did; that this was a terrorist attack. >> greg: i go back to original point. i can see bob's point there night not have been enough information. the assumption was made rather quickly that it was a spontaneous attack. where would it come from? it comes from the premise, that we deserved it. it couldn't an evil group of people that planned this. something we did pissed people off. that's what we accepted off the bat. to m
Search Results 0 to 7 of about 8 (some duplicates have been removed)